Side-by-side comparison

WALMART MATZOH BALLS, FULLY COOKED KNEIDLACH vs NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP

NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: WALMART MATZOH BALLS, FULLY COOKED KNEIDLACH scores 48/100, NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP scores 72/100. NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0g vs 1.1g per 100 g) and protein (20.4g vs 5.5g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

WALMART MATZOH BALLS, FULLY COOKED KNEIDLACH

Decent · 3.5 ONZ

0/ 100

other

NEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gWALMART MATZOH BALLS, FULLY COOKED KNEIDLACHNEWPORT, PEELED DEVEINED TAIL-OFF SHRIMP

Calories142.86 kcal106.19 kcal

Protein5.49 g20.44 g

Fiber1.1 g0 g

Total fat5.49 g1.77 g

Saturated fat1.1 g0 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium32.97 mg150.44 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium21.98 mg53.01 mg

Iron1.19 mg2.39 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.