Side-by-side comparison

SWANSON CHICKEN & DUMPLINGS vs IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

IMPOSSIBLE BEEF wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SWANSON CHICKEN & DUMPLINGS scores 39/100, IMPOSSIBLE BEEF scores 63/100. IMPOSSIBLE BEEF wins by 24 points on sodium (327mg vs 401mg per 100 g) and protein (16.8g vs 4.5g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

SWANSON CHICKEN & DUMPLINGS

Poor · 1 cup

0/ 100

prepared

IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gSWANSON CHICKEN & DUMPLINGSIMPOSSIBLE BEEF

Calories97.17 kcal204.42 kcal

Protein4.45 g16.81 g

Fiber0.8 g4.4 g

Total fat4.45 g11.5 g

Saturated fat1.82 g5.31 g

Added sugar0 g0.9 g

Sodium400.81 mg327.43 mg

Potassium0 mg618.58 mg

Calcium15.99 mg159.29 mg

Iron0.29 mg3.72 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.