FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

SOUR PATCH WATERMELON SOFT CANDY WATERMELON FAT FREE1X3.400 OZ vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: SOUR PATCH WATERMELON SOFT CANDY WATERMELON FAT FREE1X3.400 OZ scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 52.1g per 100 g) and sodium (0mg vs 38mg per 100 g).

Per 100gSOUR PATCH WATERMELON SOFT CANDY WATERMELON FAT FREE1X3.400 OZLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories358.97 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein0 g9.8 g
Fiber0 g9.8 g
Total fat0 g25.49 g
Saturated fat0 g4.9 g
Added sugar52.05 g0 g
Sodium37.95 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium1 mg78.04 mg
Iron0.18 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.