Side-by-side comparison

GREAT VALUE VIENNA SAUSAGE IN CHICKEN BROTH, CHICKEN BROTH vs POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE

POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE wins by 51 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: GREAT VALUE VIENNA SAUSAGE IN CHICKEN BROTH, CHICKEN BROTH scores 34/100, POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE scores 85/100. POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE wins by 51 points on saturated fat (1.8g vs 5.2g per 100 g) and sodium (304mg vs 979mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

GREAT VALUE VIENNA SAUSAGE IN CHICKEN BROTH, CHICKEN BROTH

Poor · 3 SAUSAGES

0/ 100

prepared

POLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE

Very good · 2 ONZ

Per 100gGREAT VALUE VIENNA SAUSAGE IN CHICKEN BROTH, CHICKEN BROTHPOLAR SARDINES IN TOMATO SAUCE

Calories207.92 kcal106.96 kcal

Protein10.4 g17.86 g

Fiber0 g1.8 g

Total fat16.71 g35.71 g

Saturated fat5.21 g1.79 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium979.17 mg303.57 mg

Potassium82.92 mg0 mg

Calcium125 mg357.14 mg

Iron1.5 mg1.93 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.