Side-by-side comparison

GARDEN OF EATIN' BLUE CORN TACO SHELLS, RED HOT vs ADAMS PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT CHICLETS CHEWING GUM, PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT

GARDEN OF EATIN' BLUE CORN TACO SHELLS, RED HOT wins by 71 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: GARDEN OF EATIN' BLUE CORN TACO SHELLS, RED HOT scores 71/100, ADAMS PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT CHICLETS CHEWING GUM, PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT scores 0/100. GARDEN OF EATIN' BLUE CORN TACO SHELLS, RED HOT wins by 71 points on added sugar (0g vs 46.7g per 100 g) and protein (7.7g vs 0g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

GARDEN OF EATIN' BLUE CORN TACO SHELLS, RED HOT

Good · 2 TACO SHELLS

0/ 100

other

ADAMS PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT CHICLETS CHEWING GUM, PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT

Avoid · 2 PIECES

Per 100gGARDEN OF EATIN' BLUE CORN TACO SHELLS, RED HOTADAMS PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT CHICLETS CHEWING GUM, PEPPERMINT, SPEARMINT

Calories500 kcal333 kcal

Protein7.69 g0 g

Fiber3.8 g0 g

Total fat26.88 g0 g

Saturated fat1.92 g0 g

Added sugar0 g46.67 g

Sodium1188.46 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron1.38 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.