FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

Gamesa Giro Chocolate Sandwich Cookies 10.6 Ounce Plastic Bag vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 54 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Gamesa Giro Chocolate Sandwich Cookies 10.6 Ounce Plastic Bag scores 28/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 54 points on saturated fat (4.9g vs 10g per 100 g) and sodium (0mg vs 500mg per 100 g).

Per 100gGamesa Giro Chocolate Sandwich Cookies 10.6 Ounce Plastic BagLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories466.67 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein6.67 g9.8 g
Fiber3.3 g9.8 g
Total fat20 g25.49 g
Saturated fat10 g4.9 g
Added sugar0 g0 g
Sodium500 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium67 mg78.04 mg
Iron4.8 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.