Side-by-side comparison

FIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQ vs OCEANKIST FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM

OCEANKIST FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: FIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQ scores 48/100, OCEANKIST FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM scores 72/100. OCEANKIST FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 2.7g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 1.4g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

FIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQ

Decent · 13 bites

0/ 100

other

OCEANKIST FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gFIELD ROAST SWEET CHILE BBQ PLANT-BASED BITES, SWEET CHILE BBQOCEANKIST FROZEN COOKED WHOLE WHITE CLAM

Calories254.55 kcal132.74 kcal

Protein11.82 g20.44 g

Fiber2.7 g0 g

Total fat12.73 g1.77 g

Saturated fat1.36 g0 g

Added sugar2.7 g0 g

Sodium600 mg115.04 mg

Potassium145.45 mg0 mg

Calcium18 mg87.96 mg

Iron3.18 mg6.37 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.