Side-by-side comparison

CRACOVIA MACKEREL FILLETS HUNGARIAN STYLE vs NEWPORT, EZ-PEEL RAW SHRIMP

NEWPORT, EZ-PEEL RAW SHRIMP wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: CRACOVIA MACKEREL FILLETS HUNGARIAN STYLE scores 48/100, NEWPORT, EZ-PEEL RAW SHRIMP scores 72/100. NEWPORT, EZ-PEEL RAW SHRIMP wins by 24 points on added sugar (0g vs 1.3g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 5.4g per 100 g).

0/ 100

other

CRACOVIA MACKEREL FILLETS HUNGARIAN STYLE

Decent · 2 ONZ

0/ 100

other

NEWPORT, EZ-PEEL RAW SHRIMP

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gCRACOVIA MACKEREL FILLETS HUNGARIAN STYLENEWPORT, EZ-PEEL RAW SHRIMP

Calories161.07 kcal106.19 kcal

Protein14.3 g20.44 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat10.7 g1.77 g

Saturated fat5.36 g0 g

Added sugar1.25 g0 g

Sodium250 mg150.44 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium53.93 mg53.01 mg

Iron0.96 mg2.39 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.