Side-by-side comparison

CORN NUTS CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON CRUNCHY CORN KERNELS, CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON vs ANOVA SNAPPER

ANOVA SNAPPER wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: CORN NUTS CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON CRUNCHY CORN KERNELS, CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON scores 44/100, ANOVA SNAPPER scores 68/100. ANOVA SNAPPER wins by 24 points on saturated fat (0g vs 2.1g per 100 g) and sodium (64.7mg vs 875mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

CORN NUTS CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON CRUNCHY CORN KERNELS, CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON

Poor · 1 pack

0/ 100

snack

ANOVA SNAPPER

Good · 6 ONZ

Per 100gCORN NUTS CHILE PICANTE CON LIMON CRUNCHY CORN KERNELS, CHILE PICANTE CON LIMONANOVA SNAPPER

Calories458.33 kcal100 kcal

Protein8.33 g20.59 g

Fiber4.21 g0 g

Total fat16.71 g1.47 g

Saturated fat2.08 g0 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium875 mg64.71 mg

Potassium260.42 mg417.06 mg

Calcium0 mg32 mg

Iron1.5 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.