Side-by-side comparison

CAPE COD, KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL vs BABY RUTH BAR

CAPE COD, KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL wins by 80 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: CAPE COD, KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL scores 80/100, BABY RUTH BAR scores 0/100. CAPE COD, KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL wins by 80 points on added sugar (0g vs 37.8g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0g vs 12.2g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

CAPE COD, KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS, ORIGINAL, ORIGINAL

Very good · 1 PACKAGE

0/ 100

snack

BABY RUTH BAR

Avoid · 2 BARS

Per 100gCAPE COD, KETTLE COOKED POTATO CHIPS, ORIGINAL, ORIGINALBABY RUTH BAR

Calories475.71 kcal459.46 kcal

Protein9.52 g5.41 g

Fiber4.76 g2.7 g

Total fat21.38 g21.59 g

Saturated fat0 g12.19 g

Added sugar0 g37.83 g

Sodium309.52 mg230 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg54.05 mg

Iron0 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.