Side-by-side comparison

CAMPBELL'S Condensed Tomato Soup vs IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

IMPOSSIBLE BEEF wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: CAMPBELL'S Condensed Tomato Soup scores 39/100, IMPOSSIBLE BEEF scores 63/100. IMPOSSIBLE BEEF wins by 24 points on added sugar (0.9g vs 5.8g per 100 g) and sodium (327mg vs 342mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

CAMPBELL'S Condensed Tomato Soup

Poor · 0.5 cup

0/ 100

prepared

IMPOSSIBLE BEEF

Good · 4 ONZ

Per 100gCAMPBELL'S Condensed Tomato SoupIMPOSSIBLE BEEF

Calories75 kcal204.42 kcal

Protein1.67 g16.81 g

Fiber0.8 g4.4 g

Total fat1.25 g11.5 g

Saturated fat0.42 g5.31 g

Added sugar5.83 g0.9 g

Sodium341.67 mg327.43 mg

Potassium583.33 mg618.58 mg

Calcium0 mg159.29 mg

Iron0 mg3.72 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.