Side-by-side comparison

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE vs Austin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE wins by 61 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE scores 61/100, Austin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz scores 0/100. BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE wins by 61 points on added sugar (0g vs 15.7g per 100 g) and saturated fat (0.7g vs 4.7g per 100 g).

0/ 100

snack

BOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE

Good · 4 BITES

0/ 100

snack

Austin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz

Avoid · 1 Package

Per 100gBOCA THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLE FALAFEL BITES, THE ORIGINAL CHIPOTLEAustin Crackers Pb & J 1.38oz

Calories197.37 kcal484.62 kcal

Protein7.89 g7 g

Fiber9.2 g2.2 g

Total fat7.89 g22.31 g

Saturated fat0.66 g4.69 g

Added sugar0 g15.7 g

Sodium723.68 mg576.92 mg

Potassium0 mg122.05 mg

Calcium78.95 mg54.1 mg

Iron2.37 mg3.21 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.