Side-by-side comparison

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON vs SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 69 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100, SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI scores 0/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 69 points on added sugar (0g vs 35g per 100 g) and sodium (439mg vs 1471mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

0/ 100

prepared

SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Avoid · 2 Tbsp

Per 100gBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMONSIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Calories102.04 kcal211.05 kcal

Protein21.43 g0 g

Fiber0 g0 g

Total fat1.53 g0 g

Saturated fat0.51 g0 g

Added sugar0 g35 g

Sodium438.78 mg1471.05 mg

Potassium142.86 mg0 mg

Calcium0 mg0 mg

Iron1.47 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.