Side-by-side comparison

BAKER'S WHITE CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BAKER'S WHITE CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 64.3g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 17.9g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

BAKER'S WHITE CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATE

Avoid · 2 PIECES

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gBAKER'S WHITE CHOCOLATE PREMIUM BAKING BAR, WHITE CHOCOLATELARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories570.71 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein7.14 g9.8 g

Fiber0 g9.8 g

Total fat32.07 g25.49 g

Saturated fat17.93 g4.9 g

Added sugar64.3 g0 g

Sodium71 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium0 mg78.04 mg

Iron0 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.