Side-by-side comparison

BAKER'S, BAKING CHOCOLATE BAR, BITTERSWEET, BITTERSWEET vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 68 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BAKER'S, BAKING CHOCOLATE BAR, BITTERSWEET, BITTERSWEET scores 14/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 68 points on added sugar (0g vs 20g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 21.4g per 100 g).

0/ 100

beverage

BAKER'S, BAKING CHOCOLATE BAR, BITTERSWEET, BITTERSWEET

Avoid · 2 PIECES

0/ 100

beverage

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Very good · 1 BAR

Per 100gBAKER'S, BAKING CHOCOLATE BAR, BITTERSWEET, BITTERSWEETLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

Calories570.71 kcal470.59 kcal

Protein7.14 g9.8 g

Fiber14.29 g9.8 g

Total fat35.71 g25.49 g

Saturated fat21.43 g4.9 g

Added sugar20 g0 g

Sodium0 mg0 mg

Potassium0 mg745.1 mg

Calcium0 mg78.04 mg

Iron5.14 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.