FoodScore

Side-by-side comparison

BABY RUTH BARS vs LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW

LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: BABY RUTH BARS scores 0/100, LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW scores 82/100. LARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW wins by 82 points on added sugar (0g vs 38.9g per 100 g) and saturated fat (4.9g vs 11.1g per 100 g).

0/ 100
beverage
BABY RUTH BARS
Avoid · 4 BARS
Per 100gBABY RUTH BARSLARABAR, THE ORIGINAL FRUIT & NUT FOOD BAR, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW, CHOCOLATE COCONUT CHEW
Calories466.67 kcal470.59 kcal
Protein4.44 g9.8 g
Fiber2.2 g9.8 g
Total fat20 g25.49 g
Saturated fat11.11 g4.9 g
Added sugar38.89 g0 g
Sodium244.44 mg0 mg
Potassium0 mg745.1 mg
Calcium44 mg78.04 mg
Iron0 mg3.53 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.