Side-by-side comparison

Amy's Indian Mattar Tofu vs BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: Amy's Indian Mattar Tofu scores 45/100, BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON scores 69/100. BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON wins by 24 points on protein (21.4g vs 4.8g per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

Amy's Indian Mattar Tofu

Decent · 1 tray

0/ 100

prepared

BLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Good · 1 CAN DRAINED

Per 100gAmy's Indian Mattar TofuBLUE HARBOR FISH . SKINLESS & BONELESS CHUNK STYLE WILD PINK SALMON

Calories111.9 kcal102.04 kcal

Protein4.83 g21.43 g

Fiber1.5 g0 g

Total fat2.97 g1.53 g

Saturated fat0.37 g0.51 g

Added sugar0 g0 g

Sodium237.92 mg438.78 mg

Potassium163.94 mg142.86 mg

Calcium30 mg0 mg

Iron1.08 mg1.47 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.