Side-by-side comparison

ALWADI, QUINOA FALAFEL vs SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

ALWADI, QUINOA FALAFEL wins by 61 points on FoodScore. Nutrient breakdown below — green values are better per field.

Verdict

FoodScore: ALWADI, QUINOA FALAFEL scores 61/100, SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI scores 0/100. ALWADI, QUINOA FALAFEL wins by 61 points on added sugar (0g vs 35g per 100 g) and sodium (600mg vs 1471mg per 100 g).

0/ 100

prepared

ALWADI, QUINOA FALAFEL

Good · 3 PATTIES

0/ 100

prepared

SIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Avoid · 2 Tbsp

Per 100gALWADI, QUINOA FALAFELSIGNATURE SELECT SWEET & SPICY CHILI SAUCE, SWEET & SPICY CHILI

Calories220 kcal211.05 kcal

Protein8 g0 g

Fiber10 g0 g

Total fat6 g0 g

Saturated fat1 g0 g

Added sugar0 g35 g

Sodium600 mg1471.05 mg

Potassium0 mg0 mg

Calcium20 mg0 mg

Iron2.52 mg0 mg

Comparison uses per-100g nutrient values from USDA FoodData Central. Each field is marked in green for the option that is healthier on that specific row — but the final FoodScore weighs all fields together plus processing level (NOVA) to produce a single 0–100 number.